St. Albans vs Laurelton
Queens
St. Albans
Family Fit 65/100
Queens
Laurelton
Family Fit 60/100
St. Albans (Queens) and Laurelton (Queens), compared across the nine signals we score for families. St. Albans scores higher on Families and Transit; Laurelton leads on Affordability and Community. Overall they're 92% similar on family fit.
How they compare
| Metric | St. Albans | Laurelton |
|---|---|---|
| Family Fit | 65/100 (leads) | 60/100 |
| Families | 47/100 (leads) | 30/100 |
| Affordability | 75/100 | 79/100 (leads) |
| Schools | 53/100 (leads) | 53/100 |
| Community | 97/100 | 98/100 (leads) |
| Transit | 39/100 (leads) | 22/100 |
| Safety | 65/100 (leads) | 64/100 |
| Health | 85/100 (leads) | 83/100 |
| Activities | 57/100 | 58/100 (leads) |
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is St. Albans or Laurelton better for families?
- St. Albans and Laurelton each suit different families. St. Albans leads on Families, Transit, and Family Fit, while Laurelton leads on Affordability, Community, and Activities. What's "better" depends on what you prioritize — safety, schools, affordability, or commute. Set your priorities to see how each ranks for your family.
- How do St. Albans and Laurelton compare on safety and schools?
- St. Albans: 65/100 safety, 53/100 schools. Laurelton: 64/100 safety, 53/100 schools.
- Are St. Albans and Laurelton similar neighborhoods?
- They're 92% similar across the nine signals we score. St. Albans stands out on Families, Transit, and Family Fit.
Which neighborhood fits your family?
We rank all 262 NYC neighborhoods against what matters to you — safety, schools, commute, affordability, parks, and diversity.
See your rankings →